Just like E and marijuana, Viagra is being used (and abused) by men who not only have no prescription for it but no erectile dysfunction (ED) at all. They do so to prolong an erection rather than to achieve it, as ED drugs are meant to do. In fact, Viagra (sildefanil) and other phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors are considered among the most commonly prescribed drugs in the US today.
What many of these abusers do not realize that taking a prescription drug for recreational purposes can be dangerous. Viagra has recently been linked to an increased risk of melanoma skin cancer, which had given rise to a number of lawsuits being filed against manufacturer Pfizer for failure to warn.
Aside from melanoma, non-ED Viagra users also increase their risk of exacerbating cardiovascular problems if they already experience cardiac issues such as chest pains, congestive heart failure, low blood pressure, coronary heart disease, and exercise intolerance. The reason Viagra and similar drugs are prescription drugs is because they can pose real medical dangers when taken unadvisedly, such as recreationally.
But this doesn’t let Pfizer off the hook. While it may be argued that since non-ED sufferers should not have been prescribed with the product in the first place, there is also a very good argument that perhaps if Pfizer and other manufacturers for similar products had disclosed the risk they would not have taken the drug at all. Pfizer knew or should have known that there were such potential side effects associated with Viagra. As pointed out on the website of personal injury law firm Crowe & Mulvey, LLP, this is part of their responsibility as a drug manufacturer.
If you have developed cardiac problems or melanoma from using Viagra or similar products, you may be eligible for compensation. Contact a defective drugs lawyer in your area to find out more about filing a Viagra lawsuit.
Obesity is a major health problem globally, but especially in the US, which had the highest incidence in the world of obese or overweight adults (72%) in 2007. Things have improved somewhat, but the numbers are still high. It is no wonder then that fad diets and workouts have been making a killing in the market.
But those who do succeed on losing weight on a sensible diet and exercise regimen face a different problem: unsightly loose skin. Significant weight loss can result in skin flaps on the torso, arms, thighs, and chest that will just not go away, which is why body contouring is the next step in looking and feeling great.
According to the Bergman Folkers Plastic Surgery website, body contouring is the answer to achieving the body image that is so important for psychological and emotional health. However, body contouring procedures need to be performed by experienced surgeons with the skills and equipment to achieve the best possible results.
It is a sad fact that many cosmetic procedures do not produce the expected results, largely because of the failure of the physician to explain to their patients the precise nature of the procedure and they can and cannot expect as well as the lack of skill or experience of the surgeon performing the procedure. In many cases of cosmetic surgery, including body contouring procedures such as abdominoplasty (tummy tuck) and liposuction, it can take months or even years before achieving the desired results.
Not everyone is a good candidate for body contouring, which is why it is so important that a potential patient consult with a reputable plastic surgeon before committing to any procedure. If you have recently lost a lot of weight and are frustrated with the amount of extra skin you still have, you may want to consider body contouring. Consider only the best surgeons with the skills and the equipment to give you the best results possible.
The general definition of “lewd” is crude or offensive in a sexual way, and that is essentially how Texas law defines public lewdness (TPC § 21.07). It is when an individual deliberately engages in certain sexual acts in public or in the presence of someone who will be offended or alarmed. These include sexual intercourse, deviate sexual intercourse, and sexually-explicit contact with another person, animal or fowl. Being convicted of public lewdness in Texas is a Class A misdemeanor, good for up to one year in prison or $4,000 in fine or both.
While it may not seem like a big deal, the fact that it is considered a misdemeanor means that it is a crime. It may not be a heavy hitter like a DWI (driving while intoxicated) charge in legal terms, although first-time offenders get off with a misdemeanor as well, but it is much more humiliating because public lewdness is a sex crime.
The key phrases in this charge are “knowingly engages,” “in public” and “another is present who will be offended or alarmed.” In some cases of public lewdness, the defendant was not aware that the location was considered a public place i.e. a private club, or that another person was an inadvertent witness to a private sexual act i.e. in a deserted beach.
As pointed out on the website of the Law Offices of Mark T. Lassiter, no one wants to be labeled as a sex criminal, especially when the sexual act or conduct was between two consenting adult humans. In any cases, public lewdness was not done with the requisite knowledge of the defendant, or it may not have happened at all. If you are charged with public lewdness, you should take it as seriously as a DWI or other criminal charges. Engage the services of a competent Texas criminal defense lawyer as soon as possible to avoid a conviction.
One of the most difficult things for most mineral rights owners that have no intention or capacity to do mining themselves is to decide is whether to sell or lease their rights. Some stress in no uncertain terms that selling mineral rights is the worst thing under any circumstances based on a limited set of facts. The truth is, the wisdom of selling your mineral rights depends on many factors.
Location is of course one of the most important factor in the valuation of any real property, including mineral rights. As stated on the The Mineral Auction website, the price will depend on the perceived potential of profit. For example, if your mineral rights are located in proximity to locations known to produce profitable amounts of natural gas, oil, or marketable minerals, then it will drive the price up. The reverse is also true.
The rule of thumb is, it is better to lease if you are sure that the land will produce because you will royalties. However, if there is no certainty that the land will produce, it may be a good idea to sell, especially in states where dormant laws (inactive mineral rights may revert to surface owner after a certain period) are in effect. Texas has no such law, but mineral rights in areas that are a considerable distance from known deposits may never be worked at all, so it would make some money with no repercussions to you when you sell your mineral rights.
Another big question is whether the offer is reasonable or not. Like in any business, you need to know which way is up, and that’s not easy when it comes to mineral rights. Don’t be afraid to ask around. Consult with two or more professionals that know the ins and outs of the business and compare their quotes to make sure that you get the best possible deal.
Jackknife accidents are to trucks as rollover accidents are to SUVs. Because of their design, these vehicles are predisposed to these kinds of accidents, which is why according to the website of law firm Williams Kherkher, their operators are expected to use appropriate caution when driving them.
Tractor-trailers or “semis” are most especially prone to jackknifing because in many cases when the driver brakes too hard at high speeds or the road is wet or slippery, the trailer follows the laws of inertia and continues to travel, slewing around the stationary tractor. Unfortunately, because semis are typically huge vehicles, one that jackknifes almost inevitably involves vehicles, structures, and people in its immediate area usually causing major property damage and injury.
The same thing can happen when semis in Houston, for example, are involved in vehicular collisions, because it still means sudden deceleration. And to add insult to injury, these trucks usually carry cargo that can at the very least cause traffic to halt if it spills over or in some cases pose a threat of toxic or hazardous material exposure or fire. As a Houston personal injury lawyer may point out, these can have serious effects on property and individuals for an extended period of time.
When truck drivers make a mistake or act recklessly and cause a jackknife accident, they are considered liable. However, while in many cases jackknife truck accidents are due to driver error (either the truck operator or the other vehicle’s driver), in some instances a defective or malfunctioning part may be the culprit, so it may not be in the power of the driver to prevent the incident. In such cases, liability may lie elsewhere, such as the truck company that was aware of the problem but neglected to do anything i.e. needed brake repairs or the truck manufacturer or part manufacturer for defective design or part i.e. faulty tires.
In any case, if you have been seriously injured in a jackknife truck accident, you may be able to get compensation for your injuries. Consult with a truck accident lawyer in your area for more information.
The law is not something we easily associate with disease , but in the case of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia, it is necessary to have legislative support to help in coping with the long-term effects of such conditions. Currently, about 5 million people in the US are suffering from Alzheimer’s disease and it is an ultimately fatal disease with no immediate prospects of improvement. It is the 6th leading cause of death, with Illinois in particular reporting 3,000 deaths in 2010.
Elder law focused on the management of Alzheimer’s disease is state-based, but in the 40 or so states that do have such laws, the goal is more or less the same: to make the state a dementia capable one. It has been widely recognized that there is a need for intervention in the management of the disease, which in Illinois is expected to increase by 14% by the year 2025. The Illinois Alzheimer’s Disease Assistance Act (410 ILCS 405) details the need for awareness and long-term care of sufferers through a coordinated public health system.
It is undeniable however that Illinois cannot hope to provide the best care for more than 200,000 of its citizens with the disease without private help. Those who do not have the financial means to manage the problem are the priority for public assistance; those who do have the capacity to plan for the eventuality are encouraged to make their arrangements in advance of the onset.
Alzheimer’s disease planning makes just as much sense as taking out car insurance; you do everything you can to avoid it, but in the eventuality of failure, you are financially covered. But Alzheimer’s disease planning is not as simple as taking out car insurance; there are many things to take into consideration, not the least of which are legal dispositions.
According to the website of elder law firm Peck Ritchey, LLC, Alzheimer’s disease planning is highly recommended for those with a history of the disease, such as relatives who already have or had the disease. Such plans would address legal, financial and health care issues, estate planning, wills, acceptable treatment options, treatment of minors, and so on. Because Alzheimer’s disease affects cognition, this planning is designed to document the wishes of the patient before making competent decisions is no longer possible.
If you believe that you are predisposed to Alzheimer’s disease, you should make your plans to address this possibility. Contact an elder law attorney in your state to help you do this in proper legal and binding fashion.